1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 846 F.Supp.
  5. 846 F.Supp. 729 (1993)
 

BALL CORP. v. AMERICAN NAT. CAN CO.

Cause No. IP 91-434-C.

846 F.Supp. 729 (1993)

BALL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

October 13, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Wagner, Alan L. Barry, Micheal D. Lake, Bradley F. Rademaker, Jeffrey R. Gargano and Paul S. Hansra, Wallenstein, Wagner & Hattis, Ltd., Anton R. Valukas and William D. Heinz, Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, Jerry E. Hyland, Barnes & Thornburg, Indianapolis, IN, for defendant, American Nat. Can Co.

Clyde F. Willian, Steven Z. Szczepanski, Frank C. Nicholas and Michael H. Baniak, Willian, Brinks, Olds, Hofer, Gilson & Lione, Chicago, IL, David H. Badger, Daniel L. Boots and Gerald H. Glanzman, Willian, Brinks, Olds, Hofer, Gilson & Lione, Indianapolis, IN, for plaintiff, Ball Corp.

ORDER

McKINNEY, District Judge.

Ball has filed a motion for partial dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court for the reasons set out below now GRANTS that motion.

The Court has trifurcated this patent case. The case was divided for separate considerations of infringement, validity, and damages. The Court was told at the outset that the first two phases together would take a considerable amount of time to try. The theory for this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases