MATTER OF HUMPHREY

WCB 91-08256; CA A77851.

855 P.2d 668 (1993)

121 Or. App. 669

In the Matter of the Compensation of Elton R. HUMPHREY, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Christian Logging, Inc., Petitioners, v. Elton R. HUMPHREY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 14, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Runner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Robert L. Ackerman, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were John C. DeWenter and Ackerman, DeWenter & Huntsberger, P.C., Springfield.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and DE MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

In this workers' compensation case, substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that claimant's compensable injury is the major contributing cause of his need for surgery. The claim is therefore compensable under ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B). U-Haul of Oregon v. Burtis, 120 Or.App. 353, 852 P.2d 897 (1993).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases