1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 819 F.Supp.
  5. 819 F.Supp. 696 (1993)
 

OHIO BLDG. AUTHORITY v. XEROX CORP.

No. C2-91-1101.

819 F.Supp. 696 (1993)

The OHIO BUILDING AUTHORITY, Plaintiff, v. The XEROX CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, E.D.

As Amended May 26, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Keener, Wiles, Doucher, Van Buren & Boyle, Columbus, OH, Martin Sener, Clausen, Miller, Gorman, Caffrey & Witous, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff.

Michael Carpenter, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Columbus, OH, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BECKWITH, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon its own motion to consider whether it has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action. The parties have submitted briefs on the issue of this Court's jurisdiction. Upon review of the law and the arguments of the parties, the Court determines that it does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of this suit and that this action must be dismissed.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases