1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 848 P.2d
  5. 848 P.2d 624 (1993)
 

McKAY CREEK VALLEY ASSOCIATION v. WASHINGTON COUNTY

Nos. LUBA 92-115; CA A77482.

848 P.2d 624 (1993)

118 Or. App. 543

McKAY CREEK VALLEY ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, Daryl McCoy and Sue McCoy, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 17, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin Keaney, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, Portland.

David C. Noren, Sr. Asst. County Counsel, Hillsboro, argued the cause for respondent Washington County. With him on the brief was John M. Junkin, Washington County Counsel, Hillsboro.

Dorothy S. Cofield, Tigard, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents Daryl McCoy and Sue McCoy.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.

Petitioner appealed to LUBA from Washington County's approval of a dwelling in conjunction with farm use on respondent McCoys' (respondents) property in an exclusive farm use zone. LUBA remanded the decision, but petitioner seeks our review of LUBA's rejection of two of its assignments. We affirm.

The county's community development code makes dwellings in conjunction with farm use permitted uses in the zone if, inter alia, they...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases