THOMPSON v. BOLLIGER, HAMPTON & TARLOW

C 88 0560CV; CA A67501.

849 P.2d 526 (1993)

118 Or. App. 700

Roy B. THOMPSON, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. BOLLIGER, HAMPTON & TARLOW, a professional corporation, Respondent-Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 17, 1993.

Reconsideration Denied May 12, 1993.

Review Denied June 22, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anne Whelan Thompson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant—cross-respondent. With her on the briefs was Leiberan and Gazeley, Portland.

Harlan E. Jones, Portland, argued the cause for respondent—cross-appellant. With him on the briefs was Bolliger, Hampton & Tarlow, Portland.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LANDAU, JJ.


LANDAU, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in an action for recovery of unpaid wages, penalties and amounts due under a shareholder's contract. Defendant cross-appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part on the appeal, and affirm on the cross-appeal.

Plaintiff, an attorney, joined defendant law firm on July 1, 1987, as one of four 25-percent shareholders of a professional corporation. In the "Agreement Re Corporation" (Agreement), plaintiff promised...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases