1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 863 P.2d
  5. 863 P.2d 500 (1993)
 

PEONE v. AFSD

2-0601-CML766; CA A73529.

863 P.2d 500 (1993)

124 Or. App. 568

Richard L. PEONE, Petitioner, v. ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 17, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Young argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Oregon Legal Services Corp.

Harrison Latto, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Diane S. Lefkow, Asst. Atty. Gen.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

De MUNIZ, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD). He argues that the hearing officer erroneously interpreted a federal statute and regulations for the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program in allowing AFSD to recover an overpayment from an AFDC grant. He also argues that AFSD erroneously determined that there was an overpayment and denied him procedural due process by failing to provide him with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases