1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 859 F.Supp.
  5. 859 F.Supp. 427 (1993)
 

HURLEY v. STATE OF OR.

Civ. No. 92-302-JO.

859 F.Supp. 427 (1993)

Neil M. HURLEY, and all other similarly situated employees of the State of Oregon, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF OREGON, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

May 14, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Hoag, Aitchison, Hoag, Vick & Tarantino, Eugene, OR, for plaintiffs.

Mary Mertens James, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Salem, OR, for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge:

Plaintiffs in this class action are Oregon State Police ("OSP") employees who have charged the state of Oregon and other defendants with failing to pay them overtime pay in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.

Plaintiffs allege willful violations of the overtime compensation requirements of the FLSA and have moved for partial summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases