UNITED MINE WORKERS v. THAMES DEVELOPMENT

Civ. A. No. 2:92-0963.

821 F.Supp. 426 (1993)

UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, DISTRICT 31, and United Mine Workers of America, Local Union Nos. 190, 1352 and 8140, Plaintiffs, v. THAMES DEVELOPMENT, LTD.; Consolidated Sewell, Inc.; Meadow River Coal Company; Lady H Coal Company, Inc.; and Sewell Coal Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division.

May 25, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter D. Dinardi, Morgantown, WV, for plaintiffs.

Charles Q. Gage, Jackson & Kelly, and Forrest H. Roles and Mark E. Heath, Smith, Heenan & Althen, Charleston, WV, for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending is the motion for summary judgment of Defendants Thames Development, Ltd. ("Thames"), and Meadow River Coal Company ("Meadow River"). The Court concludes there are no genuine issues of material fact and these Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS summary judgment in favor of Thames and Meadow River.

Under Rule 56(c), Federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases