1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 816 F.Supp.
  5. 816 F.Supp. 424 (1993)
 

ST. JARRE v. HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN A.G.

Civ. A. No. 2:93cv59.

816 F.Supp. 424 (1993)

Jerry ST. JARRE, Plaintiff, v. HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN A.G., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division.

April 1, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Linwood Mills, Rutter & Montagna, Norfolk, VA, for St. Jarre.

David Neil Ventker, Huff, Poole & Mahoney, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA, for Druckmaschinen.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAYNE, District Judge.

Notwithstanding that Heidelberger Druckmaschinen A.G. ("HDAG") removed this action to this court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, it now has moved to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 12(b)(1). HDAG also seeks dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 12(b)(2), alleging the absence of in personam jurisdiction. Finally, HDAG seeks dismissal of plaintiff's strict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases