1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 13 Cal.App.4th
  5. 13 Cal.App.4th 96 (1993)
 

HACKETT v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. B071643.

13 Cal.App.4th 96 (1993)

16 Cal. Rptr.2d 405

CLIPPER HACKETT, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; ANDREW GLIN, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

February 10, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Franscell, Strickland, Roberts & Lawrence, Carol D. Janssen and Sherry L. Hovind for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Dale Runge for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.

The question before us is whether the conditional privilege created by section 1043 of the Evidence Code1 for peace officer personnel records protects all information in a deputy sheriff's file without regard to whether a particular piece of information can also be found elsewhere. Our answer is that it does.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases