1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 857 P.2d
  5. 857 P.2d 227 (1993)
 

BOYLES v. LUM AND UTTI

91-05958; CA A75549.

857 P.2d 227 (1993)

122 Or. App. 276

In the Matter of the Compensation of David R. Boyles, Claimant. David R. BOYLES, Petitioner, v. LUM AND UTTI and Safeco Insurance Company, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 4, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jan H. Faber, Astoria, argued the cause, for petitioner. With him on the brief was Patrick Lavis, P.C., Astoria.

Jerald P. Keene, Portland, argued the cause, for respondents. With him on the brief was Roberts, Reinisch, MacKenzie, Healey & Wilson, P.C., Portland.

Before DEITS, P.J., and DE MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

LEESON, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order that terminated temporary total disability benefits (TTD) because of his failure to accept modified employment. We affirm.

Claimant began receiving TTD on March 11, 1991. His union went on strike against his employer on May 1, 1991. TTD continued after the strike began. Claimant's physician released him to modified employment beginning June, 17, 1991. Employer offered him, in writing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases