1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 65 Ohio
  5. 65 Ohio St.3d 34 (1992)
 

BURT v. DODGE

No. 91-1873.

65 Ohio St.3d 34 (1992)

BURT, APPELLANT, v. DODGE, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 21, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl H. Moore, for appellant.

Lee C. Falke, Prosecuting Attorney, and Kenneth R. Pohlman, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

To obtain a writ of prohibition, a relator must show that the respondent has exercised judicial or quasi-judicial power, that the exercise of power was unauthorized by law, and that the relator has no adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Collins v. O'Farrell (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 142, 143, 573 N.E.2d 113, 115.

Issuing an arrest warrant is of course an exercise of judicial power. However...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases