CHRISTENSEN v. GENERAL ACC. INS.

No. C8-91-1876.

482 N.W.2d 510 (1992)

Pearl CHRISTENSEN, Respondent, v. GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied May 15, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randall, J., Fuller, Gary T. LaFleur, Babcock, Locher, Neilson & Mannella, Anoka, for respondent.

Arthur W. Priesz, Jr., Priesz & Jefferson, Wayzata, for appellant.

Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and RANDALL and SHORT, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant challenges the trial court's determination that respondent was alighting from a vehicle when injured and is entitled to No-Fault insurance benefits. We reverse.

FACTS

Respondent Pearl Christensen was injured after she slipped and fell on an icy street shortly after leaving her automobile. Respondent attempted to collect No-Fault insurance benefits from her insurance carrier appellant General Accident Insurance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases