1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 806 F.Supp.
  5. 806 F.Supp. 160 (1992)
 

CATTIN v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP.

No. 84-CV-48601.

806 F.Supp. 160 (1992)

Gary L. CATTIN and Thomas F. Omans, Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and Electronic Data Systems Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D.

November 5, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jules B. Olsman, Edmund O. Battersby, Woll, Crowley, Berman & Olsman, P.C., Southfield, Mich., for plaintiffs.

David M. Davis, Office of Gen. Counsel, General Motors Corp., Detroit, Mich., Terence V. Page, Clark, Hardy, Lewis, Pollard & Page, P.C., Birmingham, Mich., for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

For a more complete recitation of events that have led to Plaintiffs' Motion for Supplemental Relief, see opinions in Cattin v. General Motors Corp., 955 F.2d 416 (6th Cir.1992), Cattin v. General Motors Corp., 641 F.Supp. 591 (E.D.Mich.1986), and Cattin v. General Motors Corp., 612 F.Supp. 948<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases