1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 809 F.Supp.
  5. 809 F.Supp. 156 (1992)
 

HAMMOND v. T.J. LITLE AND CO., INC.

Civ. A. No. 88-2450-K.

809 F.Supp. 156 (1992)

Scott P. HAMMOND, Plaintiff, v. T.J. LITLE AND COMPANY, INC. and Thomas J. Litle, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

December 16, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott P. Hammond, pro se.

James W. Nagle, Goodwin, Proctor & Hoar, Boston, MA, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KEETON, District Judge.

Hill & Barlow, Michael D. Weisman, and Robert A. Bertsche (collectively, "Hill & Barlow") counsel for plaintiff Scott P. Hammond ("Hammond"), have moved for leave to withdraw, alleging that Hammond failed to cooperate and disregarded fee obligations to the firm. Hammond opposes the motion.*

For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that Hill & Barlow must be permitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases