1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 836 P.2d
  5. 836 P.2d 127 (1992)
 

STATE EX REL. JUV. DEPT. v. ROGERS

CC 79,651-A; CA A64589; SC S38258.

836 P.2d 127 (1992)

314 Or. 114

In the Matter of Amon Maurice Rogers, A Minor Child. STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent on Review, v. Amon Maurice ROGERS, Petitioner on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided August 20, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Manning, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

VAN HOOMISSEN, Justice.

We allowed review in this case to consider whether the exclusionary rule applies in a probation revocation proceeding. The Court of Appeals held that it does not. State ex rel. Juv. Dept. v. Rogers, 107 Or.App. 370, 812 P.2d 14 (1991). We disagree. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the circuit court for further proceedings.

Petitioner is a juvenile...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases