1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 794 F.Supp.
  5. 794 F.Supp. 165 (1992)
 

NICHOLS v. COSTA

Civ. A. No. 91-649.

794 F.Supp. 165 (1992)

Edward NICHOLS, Plaintiff, v. Peter L. COSTA, Esquire, Goldman, Costa, Getman & Biryla, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

July 17, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew D'Emilio, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Dennis J. Roman, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEWIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Edward Nichols filed a three-count complaint against defendants while acting pro se. Since that time, plaintiff has retained counsel and has withdrawn two of the three theories upon which he claimed the defendants were liable. Remaining in the case is one count of fraud, alleged only against defendant Peter L. Costa, an attorney in New York.

In brief, plaintiff alleges that defendant Costa...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases