1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 505 U.S.
  5. 505 U.S. 437 (1992)
 

MEDINA v. CALIFORNIA

No. 90-8370.

505 U.S. 437 (1992)

112 S.Ct. 2572

120 L.Ed.2d 353

MEDINA v. CALIFORNIA

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 22, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Pescetta, by appointment of the Court, 502 U.S. 955, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Sarah Plotkin.

Holly D. Wilkens, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Pat Zaharopoulos, Supervising Deputy Attorney General.*

Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and White, Scalia, and Thomas, JJ., joined. O'Connor, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Souter, J., joined, p. 453. Blackmun, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Stevens, J., joined, p. 456.

Justice Kennedy, delivered the opinion of the Court.

It is well established that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the criminal prosecution of a defendant who is not competent to stand trial. Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975); Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966). The issue in this case is whether the Due Process Clause permits a State to require...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases