1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 800 F.Supp.
  5. 800 F.Supp. 120 (1992)
 

SCHENCK v. KLOSTER CRUISE LTD.

Civ. A. No. 92-28(MTB).

800 F.Supp. 120 (1992)

Barbara SCHENCK and Samuel Schenck, Plaintiffs, v. KLOSTER CRUISE LIMITED, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

July 28, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weiseman Hely by James Hely, Mountainside, N.J., for plaintiffs.

Lilly Sullivan Purcell Barkan & Junge, P.C. by Peter A. Junge, Armand P. Mele, Robert F. Sloan, Bayonne, N.J., for defendant.

BARRY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Kloster Cruise Limited ("Kloster") has filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 to dismiss the complaint of plaintiffs Barbara Schenck ("Mrs. Schenck") and Samuel Schenck ("Mr. Schenck"), asserting that the action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. For the following reasons, this motion will be granted.

II. BACKGROUND

The facts underlying this action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases