STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Lazaro BORRELL, Defendant-Appellant.
STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Charles L. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Oral argument January 3, 1992.
Decided April 27, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
For the defendant-appellant, Lazaro Borrell, there were briefs by Robert R. Henak, Dean A. Strang and Shellow, Shellow & Glynn, S.C., Milwaukee and oral argument by Mr. Henak.
For the defendant-appellant, Charles L. Smith, there was a brief and oral argument by Donna L. Hintze, assistant state public defender.
For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Sally L. Wellman, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle, attorney general.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
CALLOW, WILLIAM G., J.
This case involves the constitutionality of sec. 973.014, Stats. 1987-88,1 as it affects the parole eligibility date of persons sentenced to life imprisonment. In separate cases, the circuit court denied the defendants' post-conviction motions for resentencing and held that sec. 973.014 was constitutional. The defendants appealed the decisions of the circuit court. The...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
