1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 65 Ohio
  5. 65 Ohio St.3d 25 (1992)
 

STATE EX REL. MCARTHUR v. DESOUZA ET AL.

No. 91-864.

65 Ohio St.3d 25 (1992)

THE STATE EX REL. MCARTHUR v. DESOUZA ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 14, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gareau & Dubelko Co., L.P.A., Michael R. Gareau and James M. Dubelko, for relator.

Riley, Koury, Resar & Brill and Patrick D. Riley, for respondent Mark A. DeSouza.

Terry S. Schilling, City Solicitor, and Gino Pulito, for respondents city of Elyria; city of Elyria Civil Service Commission; and Timothy Coey, Safety Service Director.

Per Curiam.

It is settled that an action in quo warranto will not lie where there exists an adequate remedy by way of appeal. State ex rel. Steyer v. Szabo (1962), 174 Ohio St. 109, 21 O.O.2d 366, 186 N.E.2d 839; State ex rel. Hanley v. Roberts (1985), 17 Ohio St.3d 1, 17 OBR 1, 476 N.E.2d 1019. Respondents claim that the commission's certification of the promotional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases