1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 824 F.Supp.
  5. 824 F.Supp. 55 (1992)
 

WILSON v. AMTRAK NAT. R.R. CORP.

Civ. No. JH-91-2802.

824 F.Supp. 55 (1992)

Joseph L. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. AMTRAK NATIONAL RAILROAD CORP., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

August 20, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph L. Wilson, plaintiff, pro se.

Nancy Carolyn Lee, Washington, DC, and Anthony W. Kraus, Miles & Stockbridge, Baltimore, MD, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOSEPH C. HOWARD, Senior District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation's (Amtrak) motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. Plaintiff Joseph L. Wilson has opposed the motion, and the defendant has replied. With these memoranda, the Court determines the matter is ready for disposition. No hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6.

I. BACKGROUND

The facts as pled by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases