1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 792 F.Supp.
  5. 792 F.Supp. 72 (1992)
 

EXXON CORP. v. HEINZE

Civ. No. A91-0543.

792 F.Supp. 72 (1992)

EXXON CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Harold HEINZE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Alaska.

February 24, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl J.D. Bauman (argued), Joseph R.D. Loescher, Hughes, Thorsness, Gantz, Powell & Brundin, Anchorage, Alaska, for plaintiffs.

Wilson Condon, Richard W. Maki (argued), Condon, Partnow & Sharrock, P.C., Anchorage, Alaska, and also Bruce M. Botelho, Asst. Atty. Gen. of State of Alaska, Juneau, Alaska, for defendants.

ORDER DENYING RECUSAL

SINGLETON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs (collectively called "Exxon") were sued by the State of Alaska ("State"), in the state superior court, in a dispute over royalties due from Exxon to the State for oil drilled on State land. The State charged that Exxon had underpaid the royalties due it. Exxon counterclaimed charging that it had overpaid the State. This law suit is still in state court. For clarity I will refer to it as the royalty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases