1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 780 F.Supp.
  5. 780 F.Supp. 42 (1992)
 

U.S. v. EDMOND

Crim. A. No. 89-162 (CRR).

780 F.Supp. 42 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America v. Rayful EDMOND, III, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 9, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., and John R. Fisher and Elizabeth H. Danello, Asst. U.S. Attys., for U.S.

Jeffrey Thompson-Retna Pullings, Raynice Thompson-Joanne Vasco, Washington, D.C., for defendants.

Peter E. Kaplan of Weiner, McCaffrey, Brodsky, Kaplan & Levin, Washington, D.C., for Dominion Bankshares Mortg. Corp.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

I. Background

On March 30, 1990, a jury returned guilty verdicts against a number of defendants in the above-captioned action. In addition, the jury returned special verdicts on Counts Six and Seven finding that the defendants' interest in each of the pieces of real property identified in Counts Six and Seven is subject to forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases