1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 253 N.J.
  5. 253 N.J. Super. 569 (1992)
 

O'KEEFE v. PASSAIC VALLEY WATER

253 N.J. Super. 569 (1992)

602 A.2d 760

WILLIAM M. O'KEEFE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT, v. PASSAIC VALLEY WATER COMMISSION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 7, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Goldman argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (William Rosenberg, attorney; Harold Goldman, of counsel and on the brief and reply brief).

Paul Schachter argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Reinhardt & Schachter, attorneys; Paul Schachter on the brief and reply brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, SHEBELL and D'ANNUNZIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

Defendant Passaic Valley Water Commission (Commission) appeals from that portion of a judgment of the Chancery Division entered following a bench trial which declares that the Commission's policy of pre-employment drug testing violates the Constitutions of both the United States and the State of New Jersey. Plaintiff William M. O'Keefe cross appeals from ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases