1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 809 F.Supp.
  5. 809 F.Supp. 3 (1992)
 

VENUTO v. WITCO CORP.

Civ. A. No. 89-2841.

809 F.Supp. 3 (1992)

Ralph VENUTO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WITCO CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

December 9, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven M. Kramer, New York City, for plaintiffs.

John G. Gilfillan, III, of the law firm Carella, Byrne, Bain & Gilfillan, Roseland, N.J., for defendants.

ORDER

RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the plaintiff's motion for recusal. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies the motion.

I. BACKGROUND

On October 2, 1992, counsel for the plaintiff, Steven M. Kramer, wrote a letter to the court stating that I should recuse myself on two grounds: 1) that Brendan Byrne, counsel for the defendants, appointed me to the New Jersey State Commission of Investigation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases