1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 66 Wn.
  5. 66 Wn. App. 745 (1992)
 

STATE v. WISSING

No. 27737-5-I.

66 Wn. App. 745 (1992)

833 P.2d 424

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DAVID R. WISSING, JR., Petitioner.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

August 3, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Henry Browne and Browne, Ressler & Jones, for petitioner.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Francis Drew Zavatsky, Deputy, for respondent.

BAKER, J.

In this case, we decide that RCW 9.68A.090, which proscribes communication with a minor for immoral purposes, is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the defendant's conduct, and therefore reverse.

I

David R. Wissing, Jr. was charged with violation of RCW 9.68A.090, based upon alleged communication with a 12-year-old boy who was visiting Wissing's house with his family. According to the boy, Wissing showed him some "Playboy-type" magazines...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases