1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 794 F.Supp.
  5. 794 F.Supp. 15 (1992)
 

HARTNESS v. BUSH

Civ. A. No. 89-0044-LFO.

794 F.Supp. 15 (1992)

Norman HARTNESS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. George BUSH, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

July 17, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey F. Liss, Benjamin S. Boyd, Robert M. Sadler, Piper & Marbury, Washington, D.C., (Arthur B. Spitzer, Elizabeth Symonds, American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the Nat. Capital Area, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Patrick Sorek, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Div., Washington, D.C., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

OBERDORFER, District Judge.

This matter originated on behalf of a number of employees of the Executive Office of the President ("EOP") who were designated for random urine tests as part of a Plan to establish a drug-free federal workplace in that office. It is now before the Court on plaintiffs' motions for a permanent injunction and cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs contend the entire Plan is invalid for failure to comply with the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases