HAYS v. CONTINENTAL INS. CO.

No. 1 CA-CV 90-600.

172 Ariz. 573 (1992)

838 P.2d 1334

Maxine HAYS, a single person, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

Review Granted November 3, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnett & Arnett by Mark W. Arnett, Wayne C. Arnett, Tempe, for plaintiff-appellant.

Robbins & Green, P.A. by David J. Gilchrist, Phoenix, and Grossman, O'Grady & McGoldrick by Michael J. O'Grady, Scottsdale, for defendant-appellee.


OPINION

VOSS, Judge.

Plaintiff/Appellant Maxine Hays challenges the constitutionality of Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. ("A.R.S.") § 23-930, which provides that the Arizona Industrial Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over complaints that an employer, self-insured employer, insurance carrier or claims processing representative engaged in unfair practices or bad faith in processing workers' compensation claims.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE BELOW

Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases