1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 64 Ohio
  5. 64 Ohio St.3d 669 (1992)
 

TOLEDO BAR ASSN. v. McGILL

Nos. 92-425 and 92-426.

64 Ohio St.3d 669 (1992)

TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. McGILL. TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. LEIZERMAN.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 16, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan B. Cherry and Peter L. Moran, for relator.

Charles W. Kettlewell, for Michael E. McGill.

Charles W. Kettlewell and Mark H. Aultman, for E.J. Leizerman.

John J. Rossi and James L. Cox, Jr., urging dismissal pro hac vice, for amicus curiae Academy of Rail Labor Attorneys.

Bob Gibbins and Jeff White, urging dismissal pro hac vice, for amicus curiae American Trial Lawyers Association.

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondents committed the disciplinary violations found by the board. Nevertheless, we find some merit in respondents' assertion that DR 5-103(B) should perhaps be re-examined.1 While the actions undertaken by respondents constituted violations of DR 5-103(B), the arguments raised by them, regarding this rule, warrant some review.

Accordingly, we reject the recommendation of the board, and order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases