1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 64 Ohio
  5. 64 Ohio St.3d 649 (1992)
 

STATE v. BROWN

No. 91-1417.

64 Ohio St.3d 649 (1992)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. BROWN, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 9, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Horowitz, Prosecuting Attorney, and Ronald Mark Caldwell, for appellant. Randall M. Dana, Ohio Public Defender, John A. Bay and Shelly R. Smith, for appellee.

WRIGHT, J.

This case involves a narrow issue: whether a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to compulsory process over a potential witness who he believes acted as an informant in his case, and whose testimony, he asserts, would be relevant and aid in his defense. For the reasons that follow, we uphold the judgment of the court of appeals.

In State v. Williams (1983), 4 Ohio St.3d 74, 4 OBR 196,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases