1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 254 N.J.
  5. 254 N.J. Super. 456 (1992)
 

LIEBERMAN v. PORT AUTHORITY

254 N.J. Super. 456 (1992)

603 A.2d 983

BELLE LIEBERMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND CHARLES SHEROD, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 5, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh H. Welsh, attorney for appellant (Hugh H. Welsh, of counsel; Donald F. Burke, on the briefs).

Krumholz Horn Shechtman Hirsch, attorneys for respondent (Alan L. Krumholz, on the brief).

No other parties participated in this appeal.

Before Judges PETRELLA, R.S. COHEN and ARNOLD M. STEIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Port Authority) appeals, on leave granted, from the denial of its motion to dismiss the complaint filed by Belle Lieberman as well as the denial of its motion for reconsideration. It argues on appeal that there is no cause of action against it for enhanced risk to commuters due to the presence of persons who...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases