1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 259 N.J.
  5. 259 N.J. Super. 425 (1992)
 

MILLER v. JOSEPH SAVINO & SON, INC.

259 N.J. Super. 425 (1992)

614 A.2d 160

ROSCOE MILLER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH SAVINO & SON, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 14, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Lustbader argued the cause for appellant (Philip M. Lustbader and David Lustbader, attorneys; John L. Riordan, Jr., of counsel and on the brief).

Ronald H. Siegel argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges MICHELS and BAIME.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Respondent-employer Joseph Savino & Son, Inc. appeals from a judgment of the Division of Workers' Compensation (Division) that awarded petitioner-employee Roscoe Miller attorney fees of $11,500. The pivotal issue raised by this appeal is whether respondent's offer of compensation for 100% of the right eye and tender of the amount then due to petitioner was made within a reasonable time within the scope...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases