1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 253 N.J.
  5. 253 N.J. Super. 418 (1992)
 

ROE v. ROE

253 N.J. Super. 418 (1992)

601 A.2d 1201

DONNA ROE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD ROE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 31, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys for appellant (David M. Wildstein, of counsel; Noel S. Tonneman, on the brief).

Rudnick, Addonizio & Pappa, attorneys for respondent (James J. Addonizio, of counsel; Thomas M. Comer, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, GRUCCIO and BROCHIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

This is an appeal from a March 25, 1991 adjudication of domestic violence under the now-repealed original Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-1 to 2C:25-16 (the Act); L. 1981, c. 426. The Act has been repealed and replaced by the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act of 1990, L. 1991, c. 261, § 20, effective...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases