1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 64 Ohio
  5. 64 Ohio St.3d 601 (1992)
 

FANTOZZI v. SANDUSKY CEMENT PROD. CO.

No. 91-1169.

64 Ohio St.3d 601 (1992)

FANTOZZI ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. SANDUSKY CEMENT PRODUCTS COMPANY, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 9, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski and David R. Pheils, Jr., for appellees and cross-appellants.

Manahan, Pietrykowski, Bamman & DeLaney, Gerald R. Kowalski and William F. Pietrykowski, for appellant and cross-appellee.

HOLMES, J.

The two issues before this court are whether the trial court committed reversible error when it ordered the parties, when they had objected, to participate in a videotape trial, and whether the trial court committed prejudicial error when it provided the jury with a separate interrogatory concerning damages for past and future "loss of life's enjoyment." For the reasons that follow, we answer the first query...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases