1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 130 N.J.
  5. 130 N.J. 522 (1992)
 

HOLMDEL TP. v. DIR., DIV. OF TAX.

130 N.J. 522 (1992)

617 A.2d 656

TOWNSHIP OF HOLMDEL, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 3, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary R. Hamill, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mary C. Jacobson, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel).

Frederick W. Rose argued the cause for respondent (Young, Rose, Imbriaco & Burke, attorneys; Mr. Rose, Gianfranco A. Pietrafesa, and J. Andrew Kinsey, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 12 N.J.Tax 112 (1991).

STEIN, J., concurring.

Although joining in the Court's affirmance of the judgment below, I am much less confident than was the Appellate Division that the "articulated objective" of the legislation under scrutiny can be discerned simply from an examination of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases