1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 504 U.S.
  5. 504 U.S. 127 (1992)
 

RIGGINS v. NEVADA

No. 90-8466.

504 U.S. 127 (1992)

112 S.Ct. 1810

118 L.Ed.2d 479

RIGGINS v. NEVADA

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 18, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mace J. Yampolsky argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Jay Topkis, Neal H. Klausner, and Steven C. Herzog.

James Tufteland argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Rex Bell.*

O'Connor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and White, Blackmun, Stevens, and Souter, JJ., joined. Kennedy, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, p. 138. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Scalia, J., joined except as to Part II—A, p. 146.

Justice O'Connor, delivered the opinion of the Court.

Petitioner David Riggins challenges his murder and robbery convictions on the ground that the State of Nevada unconstitutionally forced an antipsychotic drug upon him during trial. Because the Nevada courts failed to make findings sufficient to support forced administration of the drug, we reverse.

I

During the early hours of November 20, 1987, Paul Wade...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases