1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 253 N.J.
  5. 253 N.J. Super. 320 (1992)
 

STATE v. HOLUP

253 N.J. Super. 320 (1992)

601 A.2d 777

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BRADLEY HOLUP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 4, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marc J. Rogoff argued the cause for appellant.

Brian E. Rumpf argued the cause for respondent (Hiering, Hoffman & Gannon, attorneys).

Before Judges KING, GRUCCIO and BROCHIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GRUCCIO, J.A.D.

On appeal, defendant Bradley Holup contends that his convictions for driving while intoxicated, N.J.S.A. 39:4-50; careless driving, N.J.S.A. 39:4-97; and an obstructed windshield, N.J.S.A. 39:3-74, should be vacated and all charges dismissed because the State failed to respond to his requests for discovery.

Defendant was issued a complaint-summons for the above violations on June...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases