1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 127 N.J.
  5. 127 N.J. 394 (1992)
 

LAKE SHORE ESTATES v. DENVILLE TP.

127 N.J. 394 (1992)

605 A.2d 1073

LAKE SHORE ESTATES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DENVILLE TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD, MAYOR AND MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF DENVILLE, AND TOWNSHIP OF DENVILLE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 16, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence S. Berger argued the cause for appellant (Berger & Bornstein, attorneys; Bernd E. Hefele and Robert A. Bornstein, on the brief).

Joel A. Murphy argued the cause for respondents (Murphy and Kurnos, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 255 N.J.Super. 580, 605 A.2d 1106 (1991).

O'HERN, J., dissenting.

I would reverse the Appellate Division's judgment and reinstate the judgment of the Law Division. There is no legal impediment to that result. The "time-of-decision" rule is a rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases