1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 255 N.J.
  5. 255 N.J. Super. 262 (1992)
 

BROWER DEV. v. PLANNING BD.

255 N.J. Super. 262 (1992)

604 A.2d 994

BROWER DEVELOPMENT CORP. AND JOSEPH D. BROWER, JR., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON AND THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 2, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ralph J. Salerno argued the cause for the appellants (Salerno & Lunga, attorneys).

William A. Shurts argued the cause for the respondent, Planning Board of the Township of Clinton (Felter, Cain & Shurts, attorneys).

Raymond S. Papperman argued the cause for the respondent, The Mayor and Council of the Township of Clinton (Vaida & Manfreda, attorneys).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, STERN and KEEFE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KEEFE, J.A.D.

The issue to be decided is whether in municipalities which require that a notice of hearing concerning site plan approval be given to all property owners within 200 feet of the property which is "the subject of [the site plan] hearing," the applicant must give notice to property owners within 200 feet of property that is not owned by the applicant but will be used by the applicant as a secondary access road to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases