1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 128 N.J.
  5. 128 N.J. 270 (1992)
 

MATTER OF BOCK

128 N.J. 270 (1992)

607 A.2d 1307

IN THE MATTER OF FRANCIS A. BOCK, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 26, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Janasie, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Martin Newmark argued the cause for respondent (Broderick, Newmark & Grather, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This attorney discipline matter arises from a Report and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months. Three members of the DRB disagreed and concluded that a public reprimand, coupled with a requirement of certain supervisory practices, would constitute sufficient punishment. The majority recommendation is based on findings of the District X Ethics Committee, concurred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases