1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 257 N.J.
  5. 257 N.J. Super. 75 (1992)
 

PROSTAK v. PROSTAK

257 N.J. Super. 75 (1992)

607 A.2d 1349

HELEN PROSTAK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT, v. JOHN AND SOPHIE PROSTAK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS/CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 11, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Danziger argued the cause for appellants/cross-respondents (Large, Scammell & Danziger, attorneys; Robert F. Danziger on the brief).

Robert I. Kuchinsky argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Robert I. Kuchinsky, P.A., attorney; Robert I. Kuchinsky on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, R.S. COHEN and ARNOLD M. STEIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by ARNOLD M. STEIN, J.A.D.

Defendants appeal the Chancery Division's order of partition adopting the recommendation of the commissioner appointed pursuant to R. 4:63-1. Plaintiff cross-appeals the denial of interest on the delayed payment of owelty, the valuation difference after partition. She also appeals the granting to defendants of a life estate for the use of a shale road placed on her side of the partition line...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases