1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 254 N.J.
  5. 254 N.J. Super. 43 (1992)
 

GILBERT SPRUANCE v. PA. MFRS.' INS.

254 N.J. Super. 43 (1992)

603 A.2d 61

THE GILBERT SPRUANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PENNSYLVANIA MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 14, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rapp, White, Janssen & German, attorneys for appellant (Henry H. Janssen on the brief).

Robinson & Sacharow and Sherr, Joffe & Zuckerman, attorneys for respondent (Steven Steingard and Mark C. Schultz on the brief).

Smith, Stratton, Wise, Heher & Brennan, attorneys for amicus curiae Insurance Environmental Litigation Association (Wendy L. Mager on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, R.S. COHEN and KESTIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by COHEN, R.S., J.A.D.

Plaintiff The Gilbert Spruance Company is a Pennsylvania corporation which manufactures paint in Philadelphia. Defendant Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association Insurance Company ("PMA") is a Pennsylvania insurer which is licensed to do business in New Jersey. From 1971 through 1988, PMA issued plaintiff comprehensive general liability policies. Each of them...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases