D'ALIA v. ALLIED-SIGNAL CORP.


260 N.J. Super. 1 (1992)

614 A.2d 1355

CELESTE D'ALIA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ALLIED-SIGNAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 20, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael K. Fielo argued the cause for appellant (Roberts, Pedicini & Fielo, attorneys; Stephen M. Higgins on the brief).

Theresa Donahue Egler argued the cause for respondent (Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, attorneys; Ms. Egler on the brief).

Before Judges BILDER, BAIME and WALLACE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.

This appeal presents novel questions under the Family Leave Act (N.J.S.A. 34:11B-1 through -16). The Act guarantees the right of an employee to take a period of leave upon the birth of a child or other family emergency without incurring the risk of losing his or her employment. Upon the expiration of the leave, the employee is entitled to be restored to his or her former job or to an equivalent position...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases