1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 786 F.Supp.
  5. 786 F.Supp. 1537 (1992)
 

IN RE BURKE, INC.

MDL No. 809-JSL.

786 F.Supp. 1537 (1992)

In re BURKE, INC., Personal Mobility Vehicle Patent Litigation.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

January 8, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James S. Wallace, Jr., Wiley, Rein & Fielding, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

John E. Kelly, Kelly, Bauersfeld & Lowry, Woodland Hills, Cal., for defendants.

OPINION

LETTS, District Judge.

Before the Court is plaintiff Burke, Inc.'s motion to reconsider the directed verdict granted in favor of defendants Everest & Jennings, Inc. and Invacare Corp. Defendants moved for the directed verdict at the close of plaintiff's evidence. In its case-in-chief, Burke introduced U.S. Patent No. 4,570,739 (the "patent") into evidence. Plaintiff also presented evidence intended to show that the patented invention represented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases