1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 802 F.Supp.
  5. 802 F.Supp. 1480 (1992)
 

FLOERCHINGER v. INTELLICALL, INC.

Civ. A. No. 3:92-CV-1358-D.

802 F.Supp. 1480 (1992)

Thomas A. FLOERCHINGER, Plaintiff, v. INTELLICALL, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division.

October 6, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Musslewhite, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff.

Richard M. Kobdish and Rebecca A. Siegel of Johnson & Gibbs, Dallas, Tex., for defendants.

FITZWATER, District Judge:

The instant motion to remand this action to state court requires the court to decide whether the indemnity agreement at issue is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. Concluding it is not, the court remands the case to state court.

I

Plaintiff Thomas A. Floerchinger ("Floerchinger") sued defendants Intellicall...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases