1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 799 F.Supp.
  5. 799 F.Supp. 1467 (1992)
 

VAN BRUNT v. RAUSCHENBERG

No. 91 Civ. 5662 (JSM).

799 F.Supp. 1467 (1992)

William Edwin VAN BRUNT, III, Plaintiff v. Robert RAUSCHENBERG, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 9, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Judith E. Siegel-Baum, Jaffe & Asher, New York City, for plaintiff.

Robert J. Kheel and William J. Borner, Willkie Farr & Gallagher, New York City, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MARTIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff William Edwin Van Brunt, III ("Van Brunt") commenced this action against Defendant Robert Rauschenberg ("Rauschenberg"), a world renown artist, alleging, inter alia, breach of contract and conversion and replevin. Previously, this Court dismissed the complaint with leave to replead. Defendant Rauschenberg now moves, for the second time, for a dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases