1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 800 F.Supp.
  5. 800 F.Supp. 1456 (1992)
 

STATE OF TEX. v. SYNCHRONAL CORP.

No. A 90 CA 783.

800 F.Supp. 1456 (1992)

STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. SYNCHRONAL CORPORATION, Synchronal Group, Inc., Omexin Corporation, Smoothline, Inc., Richard Kaylor, Thomas L. Fenton, and Ira Smolev, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division.

June 9, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Laurence Macon, Akin, Gump, Strauss, et al, David Blair West, Cox & Smith, San Antonio, Tex., Robert E. Reyna, Texas Attorney General's Office, Consumer Protection Div., Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff.

Craig Jordan, Asst. Atty. Gen., No Pro Hac Vice, Consumer Protection Div., Dallas, Tex., Stephen T. Hutcheson, Cox & Smith, Inc., San Antonio, Tex., Stuart L. Friedel, Michael C. Lasky, Davis & Gilbert, New York City, for defendants.

FIRST AMENDED ORDER

SPARKS, District Judge.

On March 26, 1992, counsel for the parties in the above-styled lawsuit appeared before this Court to argue pending motions. As commonly encountered by the Court, the suit has an interesting and slightly convoluted procedural history that requires a brief explanation.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The parties listed above as Defendants, Synchronal, et al. ("Synchronal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases