1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 64 Ohio
  5. 64 Ohio St.3d 156 (1992)
 

STONE v. CITY OF STOW

No. 91-693.

64 Ohio St.3d 156 (1992)

STONE ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF STOW ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 8, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roderick, Myers & Linton, Robert F. Linton and Lawrence R. Bach, for appellants.

James Martin and James A. Merlitti, for appellees city of Stow and Hudson Township.

Charles E. Merchant, for appellee village of Hudson.

Richard L. Goldsmith, Jr., for appellee village of Munroe Falls.

Richard A. Schunk, Law Director, for appellee city of Tallmadge.

ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

In their appeal to this court, appellants contend that R.C. 3719.13, 3719.27, and Ohio Adm.Code 4729-5-17 violate both the right of privacy and the prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures found in the United States and Ohio Constitutions. For the reasons which follow, we find that the statutory and regulatory program allowing officers and pharmacy board agents to inspect prescription records withstands constitutional scrutiny...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases