HUDLIN v. ALEXANDER

No. 90-1538.

63 Ohio St.3d 153 (1992)

HUDLIN, APPELLANT, v. ALEXANDER, WARDEN, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 11, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Harvey Johnson, for appellant.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Samuel N. Lillard, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Appellee contends that the issue is res judicata because this court dismissed an original action in habeas corpus on the same facts. Appellant asserts that the issue is not res judicata because this court's dismissal of the same cause was not on the merits, but only because R.C. 2725.03 1 limits its jurisdiction.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases